|
INTRODUCTION
AND OVERVIEW
Regulations are forcing fleet
operators away from on-site refueling with petroleum fuels.
- How will retail outlets evolve to attract
commercial fleets?
- How will the alternative fuels market evolve
between retail and on-site facilities?
- What new refueling equipment and fleet
management systems will be demanded?
- What are the implications for automotive,
petroleum marketing, alternative fuels refueling equipment, and fleet
management system companies?
- As a supplier, how will market penetration
be measured?
Havill Consultants
began researching the commercial fleet market in the 1970s after two
successive Arab oil embargoes. Concerns about "supply security"
created a boom market for on-site refueling facilities. The majority of
underground storage tanks (USTs) that were installed for petroleum storage
were not adequately protected against corrosion. By the 1980s, leaking USTs
had become an environmental concern. Havill conducted numerous proprietary
research studies to position environmental products and services in this
rapidly expanding EPA regulated market. New York, California, and Florida
had enacted legislation to protect their drinking water supplies from
leaking USTs. Federal UST regulations were promulgated in 1989. That year,
Havill & Company launched the first major syndicated study ever
conducted on the petroleum equipment industry.
Market research
firms that "mass produce" industry studies were optimistic about
the prospects for a strong petroleum equipment market. Their research
methodology relied heavily on the opinions of industry experts. Many station
owners were out of compliance with the technical and financial
responsibility requirements of the new EPA regulations. It only seemed
logical that they would spend heavily to upgrade their facilities. The
research methodology employed by Havill Consultants was more robust. Since
UST registration was a federal requirement, EPA lists were compiled for an
exhaustive national survey of facility owners. After all, it was the station
owner that would decide whether or not to make the investments required to
comply with new federal regulations.
Interviews with
800 facility owners revealed that the market had already peaked, and that
the early 1990s would be lean years for industry suppliers. Following the
multi-client study conference in Detroit, April 1990, Havill Consultants
received proprietary contracts to plan down-sizing and restructuring of
client organizations. By 1992, shipments in some segments of the industry
were off 50 percent from historical levels. Today, this is old news. In the
spring of 1990, this was valuable intelligence that provided focus to the
strategic planning activities of client organizations.
During the early
1990s, Havill & Company conducted a multitude of proprietary and
syndicated petroleum industry studies. They fell into three broad areas:
Credit and Debit Card Networks and Site Controllers, Alternative Fuels, and
Stage II Vapor Recovery. Each research project pointed toward the same
conclusion. The 1989 EPA regulations had brought a structural change to the
industrial and commercial fleet refueling market. In May 1993, Havill
Consultants published its second major syndicated study of the petroleum
equipment industry. While distribution of the actual industry forecast has
been restricted to subscribing companies, National Petroleum News (NPN)
published the 1998 compliance statistics in their November 1993 feature
article. NPN called the research "the most detailed analysis and
outlook to date on the impact of the EPA's UST regs on the petroleum
marketplace." Over 1,600 owners of motor fuel facilities throughout the
country were interviewed.
One major finding
from the study was that over 30 percent of the fleet refueling facilities
included in the study had no plans for upgrading to meet the UST corrosion
protection deadline in 1998. This statistic takes into consideration planned
closures, which have been running in excess of 6 percent per year. The high
cost of equipment and the potential liability of a spill have replaced
supply security as the owner's primary concern. It is apparent that on-site
refueling can no longer be justified for convenience alone.
Havill Consultants
estimate that the 50,000 facilities with no compliance plans purchase over 5
billion gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel annually. Some of these
facilities will upgrade, some will remove their USTs and replace them with
above ground tanks, others will convert to alternative fuels, many will
close down their on-site facilities completely and refuel at retail
locations. These structural changes will occur over the next six years,
establishing a new trend in the commercial refueling market.
Separate research
conducted by Havill Consultants on the purchase behavior of fleet
administrators has shown that the decision to upgrade on-site facilities
involves a trade-off between cost and control. Fleet administrators are
concerned about fuel contamination, spills, pilferage, cross-fueling diesel
and gasoline, refueling with the wrong grade of fuel, underfilling, and
unauthorized vehicle refueling. Their central refueling facilities control
these variables. Refueling takes place in a secured area, frequently by
specialized service personnel. A log is maintained showing the date and time
of each refueling, the gallons of fuel dispensed, the vehicle identification
number and odometer reading, the driver's name, and the service performed.
Management reports are generated that allow the fleet administrator to plan
maintenance schedules and analyze fuel usage and operating costs. Unusual
patterns can be detected for further analysis.
Major oil
companies are installing new fleet management systems to increase the
control that fleet administrators have over off-site refueling. The
infrastructure for these new fleet management systems has been made possible
by advances in dispenser and POS technology, and the growth of debit and
credit card networks. During the first quarter of 1994, Havill Consultants
completed a proprietary study of Major oil company trends for POS and fleet
programs. Three-fourths of the majors aggressively market their commercial
fleet programs. They are developing proprietary systems that replicate the
management controls that fleet administrators have at their central
refueling centers. Major oil companies have been investing heavily in the
hardware to implement their fleet management systems. The research found
that two out of every three new dispensers that are shipped to major oil
companies have internal card readers installed. This is almost twice the
number shipped two years ago.
The growth in
commercial fleet systems has not gone unnoticed by independent oil companies
and C-store chains. The ‘94 State of the Industry Report published by the
National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) reported that 49% of
stores accepted fleet cards in 1993, up from 22% in 1992. Third party
suppliers like Fuelman, Wright Express, GasCard, CFN (Commercial Fueling
Network), and Pacific Pride are providing fleet card programs to fuel
marketers who choose not to develop their own programs. Some third party
suppliers have seen their business double over the past two years. These new
fleet programs offered by major oil, independent oil, and c-store companies
have increased the control that fleet administrators have over off-site
refueling. At the same time, EPA regulations have escalated the cost and
liability of on-site facilities. The combined impact has resulted in a shift
in the refueling methods of industrial and commercial vehicles from on-site
to retail locations.
To capture a share
of this emerging market, the alternative fuels industry must replicate the
most important commercial refueling amenities. Convenience and control are
important. Therefore, the most successful alternative fuels suppliers will
develop fleet card programs and provide commercial customers with management
reports like they now use. The early philosophy of "build it and they
will come" is giving way to locating refueling facilities based on
commercial vehicle traffic patterns. Realizing their strength is production,
some industry participants are turning to petroleum marketers to add
alternative fuels to their stations. To date, progress has been slow. In a
recent alternative fuels survey, most major oil companies reported to Havill
Consultants that they had built "several pilot facilities".
However, the demand for alternative fuels is negligible compared to
petroleum sales.
As fleet operators
evaluate their refueling options, they must consider how they will be
affected by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), the Energy Policy
Act of 1992 (EPACT), and state alternative fuel mandates. Excluding off-road
vehicles and truck stops, Havill Consultants estimate that 23 billion
gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel are consumed annually by commercial
vehicles. Regulations will force the annual consumption of about 600 million
gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel to alternative fuels by 1998. This
represents less than 3 percent of the available market. The challenge to the
alternative fuels industry in the 1990s is to capture a greater share of the
commercial refueling market. Cost alone will not determine success.

-----------------------------------------
OBJECTIVES
OF THE 1994 FLEET STUDY
The primary
purpose of this research is to forecast the changes that will occur in the
refueling of private and commercial fleets through 2000. The report will
provide an accurate benchmark of current vehicle and refueling demographics.
The study will detail the fleet administrator’s needs in each market
segment and evaluate how satisfied fleet administrators are with the
vehicles, fuels, and refueling systems offered by competing suppliers. The
study will also define actions that suppliers must take to influence fleet
administrators to consider their products and services. Follow-up research
planned for 1996 and 1998 will allow subscribers to track their
effectiveness in the marketplace.
The commercial
fleet market is large and diverse. It can be divided into eight major
segments: government/public owned vehicles, over the road (OTR) carriers,
dispersed corporate vehicles, utility vehicles, delivery vehicles, service
vehicles, airport vehicles, and auto rental vehicles. Currently, almost half
of all refueling is at private facilities. Over one-third of all underground
storage tanks are owned by non-retail businesses. To clearly understand the
changes that will occur in this market during the 1990s, it is important to
determine the underlying trends impacting each market segment. The overall
study objectives will be achieved by analyzing and aggregating these
individual segments. The primary objectives are to:
- Characterize each market segment in terms of
current vehicle and refueling demographics.
- Identify the fleet operator's awareness and
attitude toward current and pending federal and state regulations affecting:
- Commercial fleets
- Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA)
- Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT)
- State alternative fuel mandates
- On-site refueling facilities
- Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulations
- Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) regulations
- Determine if the operator is in compliance
with current and pending regulations.
- Define features that fleet operators must have
and want to have incorporated into their:
- Vehicle fleet
- petroleum fuels versus alternative fuels
- Refueling operations
- on-site versus off-site
- Determine the current level of satisfaction
across each market segment with fleet and refueling operations. This
comparative analysis will evaluate competing:
- Vehicle fuel types: gasoline, diesel, CNG,
M-85, LPG, LNG, E-85
- Refueling systems: on-site versus off-site
- Fleet card programs: those developed in-house
as well as those offered by major oil companies and third party suppliers
like Fuelman, Wright Express, GasCard, CFN (Commercial Fueling Network), and
Pacific Pride
- Establish the fleet operator’s criteria for
trading off cost, convenience, and control for petroleum fuels versus
alternative fuels, and for on-site versus off-site refueling.
- Benchmark the consumption of gasoline, diesel,
CNG, M-85, LPG, LNG, and E-85 fuels within the commercial fleet market;
then, determine what it would take for the fleet administrator to consider
each of the alternative choices.
- Forecast changes in vehicle fuel types
- Forecast the changes in fleet vehicle
populations based on new vehicle purchases and conversions, as the market
moves towards alternative fuels
- Record the dollar value and timing for planned
investments in refueling operations; then, determine what it would take for
them to consider each of the alternative choices.
- Forecast changes in on-site and off-site
fueling equipment
- Forecast changes in fleet card programs: those
developed in-house as well as those offered by major oil companies and third
party suppliers like Fuelman, Wright Express, GasCard, CFN (Commercial
Fueling Network), and Pacific Pride
- Characterize the fleet operator’s decision
making process when considering upgrading their current on-site refueling
facility vs. retail refueling vs. converting to alternative fuels.
- Develop alternatives to the most likely
scenarios based upon varying levels of regulatory awareness, different
levels of compliance, and the possibility of additional legislation.

-----------------------------------------
METHODOLOGY
AND PROCEDURES
Havill Consultants
have a proven track record of developing accurate industry forecasts for
syndication and for individual clients. From our experience, the most
reliable information source for predicting future buying patterns comes from
the end-users themselves. For this study, in-depth interviews will be
conducted with over 1,000 fleet administrators. They will be asked detailed
questions about their future vehicle, fuel, and refueling plans.
This study will
build on research compiled in previous studies including the well-respected
"United States EPA Regulated Retail, Commercial, and Industrial
Gasoline Service Station Market, 1992 - 1998." From that study, we know
that nearly one-third of all private facilities have no plans to bring their
sites into compliance with all of the UST regs. Furthermore, it is well
known that many fleet administrators have yet to evaluate off-site refueling
and alternative fuels. For these reasons, the study methodology will focus
on defining the underlying decision making process of fleet administrators.
By clearly understanding the trade-offs that fleet administrators make
between cost, convenience, and control, the decision making process for each
major segment of the private market will be modeled. The composite forecast
will be built by aggregating the major market segments.
An added reason
for our rigorous methodology of interviewing a large cross-section of fleet
administrators is to develop an accurate benchmark on the refueling patterns
of fleet operators. The Federal Government tracks the distribution of fuel
to retail outlets and to non-retail facilities. However, there are no
reliable statistics on the volume of fuel that is channeled into the fleet
market through retail outlets. We know that it is significant. In a recent
study, a large number of fleet owners reported that they closed their
on-site refueling operations and are now buying retail. What is not known is
the volume of fuel being sold to fleets through retail outlets and how much
growth is left in this sector of the market. It is difficult to improve
something that is not being measured. Our clients report that they would
like benchmarks every two years so they can evaluate the effectiveness of
their marketing programs and implement necessary improvements.
In preparation for
this study, Havill Consultants conducted the background research necessary
for achieving the study objectives. Primary information sources included
government agencies, fleet associations, and petroleum industry
associations. Next, the project team surveyed over 200 executives at major
corporations in the automotive, petroleum marketing, alternative fuels,
refueling equipment, and fleet management systems industries. This process
yielded the objectives for this study and the initial set of questions for
the fleet administrator questionnaires.
Our research
follows a proven methodology. The field work will begin by designing
questionnaires for the interviews that will be conducted with fleet
administrators. All questionnaires will be pre-tested by conducting a dozen
interviews, analyzing the results, making any necessary revisions, and then
continuing the cycle until all refinements have been made to the
questionnaires. Subscribers will be given the opportunity to review these
questionnaires and suggest revisions so long as the changes do not
substantially change the scope of the research.
This study will
employ a stratified random sample of at least 1,000 fleet administrators.
The list will be obtained from fleet publications, associations, and other
secondary sources. It will represent all types of fleets in all areas of the
country. An average of 125 interviews will be conducted for each of the
eight industry segments listed below:
- Government/Public-Owned
- Delivery Focused
- OTR Carriers
- Service Focused
- Dispersed Corporate Fleets
- Airport Focused
- Utility Focused
- Auto Rental Fleets
As interviews are
completed, they will be entered into the Survey System®, our full-featured
market research software program. Market survey data from each questionnaire
will be computer tabulated and projected to the fleet population. Fleet
population statistics will be based on our secondary and primary research.
Statistical procedures will be applied to establish the significance of the
research findings.
Havill &
Company will personally manage all aspects of the project. Each of the
professionals assigned to this project have petroleum marketing research
experience. They will share responsibility for the total project including
secondary research, questionnaire design, interviewing, analysis, and
writing the final report. All study findings will be fully documented in a
report of approximately 200 pages. Where appropriate, graphs will be used to
visually support the analysis.
Charter
subscribers to the study may request special analysis of specific questions
that were included in the research. Subscribers may also suggest special
analysis as long as their suggestions are submitted prior to the primary
research phase, and do not materially increase the total cost of the
research. Approximately one month after the delivery of the final report,
Havill & Company staff members will be available to meet with individual
subscribers to discuss issues arising from the study. If there is sufficient
interest, a multi-client study conference will be held in the Detroit Metro
Airport area.

-----------------------------------------
STUDY
FINDINGS
In 1989, the
industrial/commercial UST population was 768 thousand. Today it stands at a
mere 406 thousand, which represents a 47 percent decrease in the population
in only 6 years. As would be expected, the primary reasons for the reduction
in population are the EPA's corrosion and leak detection regulations. When
asked, more than half of the fleet administrators who, at one time, had
on-site refueling facilities cited the regulations as the primary reason for
the closing of their facility. High operating expenses are also a reason
cited for closing facilities.
CURRENT
COMPLIANCE WITH 1998 FPA REGULATIONS
In the current
market, 70 percent of the USTs being utilized for fuel storage are in
compliance with the 1998 EPA corrosion protection requirements.
Nevertheless, there is more to the regulations than just tank corrosion
protection.
There is also piping corrosion protection, spill
containment, overfill prevention, and leak detection to consider. When all
of the additional requirements are taken into account, only 52 percent, or
106 thousand facilities, are in compliance at this time. According to the
fleet administrators interviewed, 28 percent of the UST facilities in the
United States will be upgraded by 1998. This portion of the market
represents over 58 thousand facilities. UST replacements will dominate the
upgrade market through 1998, occurring at three-fourths of the upgrade
facilities. Following UST replacements are tank leak detection, overfill
prevention, and piping upgrades. These results indicate that at the majority
of the facilities to be upgraded, the "heart" of the system is
what will be replaced.
UST
FACILITIES CONVERTING TO AST SYSTEMS
|
Although more
than 106 thousand facilities are currently in compliance, 58 thousand
will be upgrading through 1998. Twenty-two thousand UST facilities will
have converted to AST systems. Those facilities replacing their UST
systems with AST systems can be characterized as small business fleets
that use relatively small amounts of fuel. These fleets are comprised
mainly of sedans, vans, and light duty trucks.
ASTs have become
an alternative to complying with the EPA regulations, hence, the market
for ASTs promises more robust growth through the end of the century. |
MAJOR
CHANGES SPURRED BY EPA REGULATIONS
| Presently, 70
percent of the I/C USTs meet corrosion protection requirements. However,
only 52 percent of the systems meet all requirements. This means that
5.8 billion gallons of fuel in the 4+ fleet market is dispensed at
facilities presently out of compliance with 1998 EPA regulations.
According to the plans of fleet administrators, 3.5 billion gallons are
expected to upgrade into compliance before the deadline, leaving 2.3
billion gallons out of compliance and likely to convert to off-site
refueling. This mass exodus from on-site facilities provides a
tremendous opportunity for petroleum marketers. |
 |
FLEET
VEHICLES AND THEIR REFUELING PRACTICES AND REQUIREMENTS
Until recently, the
true size, refueling volume, and segmentation of the I/C vehicle and
refueling market was all but a mystery. No one had quantified the fleet
vehicle population and its corresponding fuel consumption, especially not at
the business segment level. Because information pertaining to the commercial
market was sparse, at best, marketers had not implemented strategies that
targeted the commercial market. In recent years, marketers have begun to
realize that the commercial segment represents a significant portion of
their business volume. Therefore, market intelligence is needed to
facilitate the targeting of the commercial market and its segments. One of
these targeting opportunities lies in the market for diesel fuel. In the
commercial fleet market, diesel fuel consumption represents 46 percent of
the total fuel consumed, yet few retail outlets offer diesel fuel. The
segments consuming the most diesel fuel include construction, OTR,
manufacturing, and agriculture, each of which consumes at least 1.5 billion
gallons of diesel fuel per year.
In order to target
these segments effectively, marketers must first define the segments of the
commercial fleet population. Once this has been completed, the population
and composition of the fleets must be determined. Following these two tasks,
the travel patterns, number of miles traveled annually, and the average
miles per gallon for each vehicle type should be determined so that the
total annual consumption for each segment can be determined. In the United
States today, fleets with 4 or more vehicles account for 19 million
vehicles, or 10 percent of the total domestic vehicle population.
Interestingly enough, fuel consumption of 4+ commercial fleets represents in
excess of 20 percent of the total annual domestic fuel consumption. This
high level of concentration makes the I/C market very attractive to
petroleum marketers. In terms of fuel consumption, government,
construction, and the OTR segments combined account for 53 percent of the
annual 4+ fleet fuel consumption. Among the top three segments for fuel
consumption, on- site versus off-site consumption varies. For the government
and OTR segments, the majority of fuel consumed is dispensed through on-site
refueling facilities. Seventy-three percent of government refueling takes
place at on-site facilities compared to 54 percent for the OTR segment. For
the construction segment, however, only 35 percent of the refueling is done
on-site, leaving 65 percent of the refueling business to be conducted at
off-site or retail facilities.

-----------------------------------------
DELIVERABLES
The final report
will be based on the outline shown below. Approximately one chapter will be
dedicated to the executive summary and each major topic. The executive
summary will provide an overview of the fleet market and the core market
characteristics. Each chapter will discuss the particular objective and
related data. Each client will receive three copies of the final report.

-----------------------------------------
OVERVIEW
AND REPORT LAYOUT
Executive Summary
Introduction and Overview
Major Issues
Methodology and Data Sources
Summary of Fleet Market Forecast
Fleet Market Characteristics
Number of Owners
Number of Vehicles
Fleet Vehicle Classes
Segmentation
- Government & Public Owned
- OTR Carriers
- Dispersed Corporate Fleets
- Utility Focused
- Service Focused
- Airport Focused
- Auto Rental Fleets
- Delivery Focused
Fleet Refueling Sites
- On-site
- Shared Site
- Off-site
Fuel Management Systems in Use
- Jobber Card Lock
- Major Oil Credit Programs
- Third Party Credit Programs
- Debit-Based Systems
Present EPA Compliance
Identification of Needs and Features of
Fleet Refueling Programs
Refueling Facility Needs
- Retail vs. Commercial Dispenser
- Dedicated vs. Non-Dedicated Sites
- Dedicated vs. Non-Dedicated Islands at
Retail Outlets
- On-site/Off-site Compatibility
- 24-hour Access
- Availability of TBA Merchandise and
Services
Dispenser Features
- Card Readers in the Dispenser
- Receipt Printers
- Vehicle Identification Transmitters
(VITs)
- High-Speed Refueling Nozzles
Features of Fuel Management Systems
- Credit Transaction Capabilities
- Debit Transaction Capabilities
- Emergency Cash and/or Debit Flexibility
- Signature Verified Billing
- PIN Access Required
- Product Lock-Outs
- Time Lock-Outs
- Unauthorized Purchase Flags
- Driver Identification Data
- Location and Time Data
- Odometer Readings
- Cost per Mile
- Fuel Grade Information
- Separation of Base Fuel Price and Taxes
- Credit Ticket Receipts
- Volume Discounts
- Flexibility to Use at TBAs
- Ability to Use for Auto Rental
- Availability of Report Data on Floppy
- On-Line Availability of Report Data
Benchmark of Fuel Consumption In the
Fleet Market
Motor Gasoline
Total Market Size
- Total Gallonage
- Number of Outlets
Consumption by Distribution Channel
- Bulk from Major Oil
- Bulk from Jobber
- Direct from Major Oil Retail
- Direct from Jobber Retail
No. 2 Diesel
Total Market Size
- Total Gallonage
- Number of Outlets
Consumption by Distribution Channel
- Bulk from Major Oil
- Bulk from Jobber
- Direct from Major Oil Retail
- Direct from Jobber Retail
Alternative Fuels
Total Market Size
- Total Gallonage
- Number of Outlets
Consumption by Distribution Channel
- Bulk for On-Site Refueling
- Other Refueling Facility
Benchmark of the Commercial Credit Card
Market
Commercial Credit Market Share
Present Satisfaction Levels with Available
Fuel Refueling Programs
-
Identify
"Brand Awareness" of Existing Programs
-
Fleet Operator
Evaluations of Features, Service, and Overall Quality
-
Identify
Possible "Selling Points" and Incentives
Competitive Analysis of Major Oil and Third
Party Fleet Programs
- Number of Stations in Network
- Number of Transactions Processed
- Number of States, Stations, and
Licensees where Accepted
Benchmark of Alternative Fuel Plans
-
Identify Fleet
Plans to Incorporate Alternatively Fueled Vehicles
-
Identify Timing
for Alternative Fuel Related Decisions
-
Identify Future
Refueling Needs in Fuel Management Programs
-
Probe
Expectations for Maintenance
-
Probe
Expectations for Fueling Equipment
-
Probe Demand for
Conversion/Turnkey Services
Forecast of Market Conditions, through
2000
-
Fleet Population
Changes
-
Motor Gasoline
and Diesel Consumption
-
Alternative Fuel
Consumption
-
Fleet Refueling
Market Share
Recommendations
Profiles of Fleets Interviewed
Appendix
Note: The specific final report outline is
subject to change based on survey results. This outline is the basis for the
intended final deliverable.

-----------------------------------------
WHO
WILL BENEFIT FROM THE STUDY
This study has
been designed for clients in the automotive, petroleum marketing,
alternative fuels, refueling equipment, and fleet management systems
industries. During the design phase of this project, "issue
ballots" were mailed or faxed to 200 executives in these industries.
While each company was interested in market research on their particular
product and service, the interest in defining the structural changes
occurring in the fleet market cut across all industries.
The differences in the
type of information executives needed were more a function of the stage of
"product life cycle development" than the product itself. Several
companies reported that they had formed multi-function task forces several
years ago to develop their commercial fleet strategies. Today, their fleet
programs are well underway and their teams have disbanded. These companies
wanted market statistics that would compare their performance against
competitors and measure the effectiveness of programs already in place. They
also wanted a forecast of unit growth for planning purposes. Other
executives that we talked to said that they were now in the process of
developing their fleet strategies. They wanted the fleet administrator
"needs and satisfaction analysis" to guide market development
activities. Equally important was the segmentation analysis so market niches
could be exploited.
-
CEOs, Division
Presidents, and General Managers - This research will provide
accurate quantitative data on the size and growth of the industry and your
company's position in the marketplace. It will provide valuable benchmarks
for evaluating the effectiveness of current fleet market programs.
-
Strategic Planning -
This research will forecast the structural changes that will occur in the
fleet market for the period 1994 - 2000. It will identify the key issues
forcing change in the marketplace. This will provide valuable information
for developing long range strategic plans.
-
R&D and
Engineering Managers - This research will define the technical
specifications required by fleet administrators in each major segment of
the fleet market. This will allow technical managers to design-in the
features in greatest demand by fleet administrators and screen new product
opportunity.
-
Marketing and Product
Managers - This research will characterize the fleet market and
define the market mix required to penetrate each major segment. This will
provide valuable information for prioritizing opportunities and enhancing
market development programs.

-----------------------------------------
PRICING
AND PAYMENT
To ensure that the
study is thorough and complete, five consultants will be assigned to the
fleet market study team. This team will be available for consultation and
follow-up projects at the conclusion of the 5-month project.
The cost of this
study will be $12,500 for charter subscribers that sign up by December 15,
1994. After December 15, 1994, the subscription fee will be $14,000. To
subscribe, please fill in the purchase agreement and return one copy to us.
We are confident you will find that we have earned our reputation for
achieving significant, long-lasting results for our clients.

-----------------------------------------
FLEET
MARKET STUDY PROJECT TEAM
Havill &
Company consultants routinely conduct both syndicated and proprietary
studies of the petroleum market. Major research studies have included:
- The New European Petroleum Equipment Market
For Gasoline Service Station Products and Services. (Multi-Client,
September 1994).
- Sales & Marketing Effectiveness Tracking
Report. (Non-Competing Multi-Client, September 1994).
- Stage II Vapor Recovery - Retail,
Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Markets, Analysis and
Forecast. (Multi-Client, April 1992, September 1993, May 1994).
- Major Oil Company Trends, Stage II - POS -
Fleet Programs. (Proprietary, December 1993).
- Automatic Dry Break Fueling System Fleet
Administrator Study. (Proprietary, October 1993).
- Analysis and Trends, A Study of the 1992
Tank Market. (Proprietary, August 1993).
- The United States EPA Regulated Retail,
Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Markets, Current year
- 1998. (Multi-Client, May 1990, June 1993).
- Stage II Vapor Recovery Distribution
Analysis. (Non-Competing Multi-Client, March 1993).
- Underground Tank Retirement and Failure Rate
Study. (Proprietary, November 1992).
- Stage II Vapor Recovery Retail, Commercial,
and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Markets, Analysis and Forecast.
(Multi-Client, April 1992).
- Petroleum Industry Data Management &
Control Systems (Proprietary, December 1991).
- Retail, Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline
Service Station Market Share Study for Petroleum Equipment. (Proprietary,
October 1991).
- Petroleum Equipment Study - Retail,
Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Markets, 1990 Record -
1991 Outlook. (Multi-Client, May 1991).
- C-Store Market Opportunity for Petroleum
Equipment. (Proprietary, January 1991).
These studies have
covered the full gamut of refueling equipment: underground tanks, flexible
connectors, piping, sumps, spill containment, overfill protection, leak
detection, in-tank gauging, dispensers, hose, nozzles, Card Locks, POS, and
site controllers. From this research, we have developed contacts with
contractors, distributors, and petroleum marketers including the major oil
companies. We have conducted research outside the United States, in both
French and Spanish speaking countries.
All work on this
project will be directed by Nicholas R. Havill, founder and President of
Havill & Company. The project will be managed by Joseph Slagle and
Justin Zohn. Both have extensive project management experience in the
petroleum industry. All staff members assigned to this project has been
involved in previous petroleum market studies.

-----------------------------------------
PURCHASE
AGREEMENT
This agreement is a contract to
subscribe to The DOE-EPA Regulated Commercial Fleet Market for Fuels,
Equipment, and Services, 1994-2000 as described in this October 1994
prospectus, which the undersigned acknowledges having received and read. To
enroll, please complete and sign this agreement, and return to: Havill &
Company, Inc., 3178 N. Republic Blvd., Toledo, OH 43615. The following terms
formalize this agreement between Havill & Company, Inc.
("Havill"), and the undersigned participating company (the
"Subscriber"), who hereby agree as follows:
1. Havill shall provide to
the Subscriber three (3) copies of The DOE-EPA Regulated Commercial Fleet
Market for Fuels, Equipment, and Services, 1994-2000 report pursuant to
the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement.
2. In exchange for the
reports to be provided by Havill, the Subscriber shall pay Havill the
Subscription Fee specified in item 3, below. All services to be rendered
by Havill pursuant to this agreement are conditional upon adequate funding
from participating subscribers. Havill reserves the right to abandon the
project and terminate all of its obligations under this agreement by
written notice to the Subscriber if Havill is not fully funded. In that
case, the Subscriber's deposit will be returned and the project will be
canceled. At its discretion, Havill may proceed even if the program is not
fully subscribed.
3. Subscription Fee schedule:
3a. The Subscription Fee
for corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietors is $12,500,
one-half payable on or before December 31, 1994, and one-half payable
upon completion of the research. The subscription fee may be shared
among subsidiaries, divisions, or other legal entities thereof, in which
the Subscriber holds a significant equity position.
3b. Alliance Partners
("Partners"), are two or more corporations, partnerships, or
sole proprietors that join together in offering the marketplace a
product or service. A Subscriber to this study may sponsor a Partner if
a contractual relationship exists to share technology, marketing
responsibility, or other legitimate business activities. The Subscriber
who sponsors a Partner is required to act as intermediary in all
communications between Havill and the Subscriber’s Partner. Partners
are a special class of Subscribers and are bound to the same terms and
conditions of this agreement that bind all Subscribers. A Partner can
have only one sponsoring Subscriber. The fee schedule for each
Subscriber and each Partner of the alliance is as follows:
3b1. 1 Subscriber+1
Partner = $6,250 each prior to 12/31/94, $3,000 each upon completion.
3b2. 1 Subscriber+2
Partners = $6,250 each prior to 12/31/94, $2,000 each upon completion.
3b3. 1 Subscriber+3
Partners = $6,250 each prior to 12/31/94, $1,000 each upon completion.
3b4. 1 Subscriber+4 or
more Partners = $6,250 each prior to 12/31/94, no payment upon
completion.
4. The term of the research
provided pursuant to this agreement shall be for a period beginning upon
the date of execution of this agreement and ending upon completion of the
project. Havill may terminate its obligations under this agreement prior
to June 1, 1995, if the Subscriber does not comply with the terms or
conditions of this agreement.
5. The Subscriber hereby
consents to the use by Havill of all data and information furnished to
Havill by the Subscriber, and represents and agrees that all such data and
information will be valid and accurate.
6. Havill draws on
information and analysis believed to be reliable. However, neither Havill
nor individuals credited with authorship or support can guarantee accuracy
or completeness, or be liable for possible errors of fact or judgment. The
Subscriber hereby releases and waives any and all claims it may have
against Havill their respective directors, members, shareholders,
officers, employees, agents, and representatives (collectively,
"Representatives") from any and all claims, liabilities, or
damages resulting from the use of information or data or services provided
by Havill. The Subscriber may only use the data or information provided by
Havill within the subscriber's company, but such information shall not be
used or relied upon as the exclusive basis for evaluating sales and
marketing decisions. IN NO EVENT WILL HAVILL OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES BE
LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR
EXEMPLARY DAMAGES ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY OUT OF THE USE OF, OR
INABILITY TO USE, HAVILL INFORMATION OR SERVICES. If any of the
limitations on liability of Havill or the Subscribers affiliated therewith
or their Representatives contained in this agreement are found to be
invalid or unenforceable for any reason by a court of competent
jurisdiction, the Subscriber agrees that the maximum liability of Havill
and its affiliated Subscribers or their Representatives shall not, in the
aggregate, be greater than the enrollment price of the study paid by the
Subscriber.
7. The Subscriber
acknowledges and agrees that Havill is the owner of all rights, titles,
and interests in and to Havill research, its database and information,
including without limitation, all patent, copyright, trademark, service
mark, trade secret, and trade name rights in and to the foregoing. The
Subscriber shall not disclose to anyone, or permit anyone access to,
Havill data, information, or programs. The Subscriber agrees that any
breach of this paragraph would cause Havill irreparable injury, and that
upon any breach or attempted breach of this paragraph, Havill shall have
the right to injunctive relief in addition to any other remedies at law or
equity.
8. This agreement shall be
governed by Ohio law. Each party hereby designates the Court of Common
Pleas of Lucas County, Ohio, as the court of proper jurisdiction and venue
of and for any and all lawsuits or other legal proceedings relating to
this agreement and hereby irrevocably consent to such designation,
jurisdiction, and venue; and hereby waive any objections or defenses
relating to jurisdiction or venue with respect to any lawsuit or other
legal proceeding initiated in the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County,
Ohio.
Date:_______________, 19____
Date:_______________, 19____
___________________________________ HAVILL
& COMPANY, INC.
Accepted For:
By_________________________________
By_________________________________
(Signature)
(Signature)
___________________________________
___________________________________
Print or Type Name and
Title
Print or Type Name and Title
Address:
Telephone:
FAX:
Please send a check payable to the Havill &
Company, Inc., for $6,250 and return this signed agreement on or before
December 30, 1994 by mail to:
Havill & Company, Inc.
3178 N. Republic Blvd.
Toledo, Ohio 43615
Phone: (419) 841-2244
Fax: (419) 841-2211

|