DOE-EPA Regulated
Commercial Fleet Market
Fuels, Equipment, and Services Forcast
1994 - 2000

Benchmarking the Shift in Demand for Commercial Vehicles, Fuels, Equipment, and Services Driven by New Federal Regulations

arrow Close private refueling facilities

A reported 18 thousand private refueling facilities are planned to close accounting for 1.1 billion gallons. Those closures along with planned upgrades will still leave nearly 25 thousand private facilities or 1.2 billion gallons out of compliance at the end of 1998.

 

95f -onsite

 

Table of Contents

 

arrow Prospectus

arrow ppoint.gif (1257 bytes)

arrow More Study Findings..

 

INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

   Regulations are forcing fleet operators away from on-site refueling with petroleum fuels.

  • How will retail outlets evolve to attract commercial fleets?
  • How will the alternative fuels market evolve between retail and on-site facilities?
  • What new refueling equipment and fleet management systems will be demanded?
  • What are the implications for automotive, petroleum marketing, alternative fuels refueling equipment, and fleet management system companies?
  • As a supplier, how will market penetration be measured?

   Havill Consultants began researching the commercial fleet market in the 1970s after two successive Arab oil embargoes. Concerns about "supply security" created a boom market for on-site refueling facilities. The majority of underground storage tanks (USTs) that were installed for petroleum storage were not adequately protected against corrosion. By the 1980s, leaking USTs had become an environmental concern. Havill conducted numerous proprietary research studies to position environmental products and services in this rapidly expanding EPA regulated market. New York, California, and Florida had enacted legislation to protect their drinking water supplies from leaking USTs. Federal UST regulations were promulgated in 1989. That year, Havill & Company launched the first major syndicated study ever conducted on the petroleum equipment industry.

   Market research firms that "mass produce" industry studies were optimistic about the prospects for a strong petroleum equipment market. Their research methodology relied heavily on the opinions of industry experts. Many station owners were out of compliance with the technical and financial responsibility requirements of the new EPA regulations. It only seemed logical that they would spend heavily to upgrade their facilities. The research methodology employed by Havill Consultants was more robust. Since UST registration was a federal requirement, EPA lists were compiled for an exhaustive national survey of facility owners. After all, it was the station owner that would decide whether or not to make the investments required to comply with new federal regulations.

   Interviews with 800 facility owners revealed that the market had already peaked, and that the early 1990s would be lean years for industry suppliers. Following the multi-client study conference in Detroit, April 1990, Havill Consultants received proprietary contracts to plan down-sizing and restructuring of client organizations. By 1992, shipments in some segments of the industry were off 50 percent from historical levels. Today, this is old news. In the spring of 1990, this was valuable intelligence that provided focus to the strategic planning activities of client organizations.

   During the early 1990s, Havill & Company conducted a multitude of proprietary and syndicated petroleum industry studies. They fell into three broad areas: Credit and Debit Card Networks and Site Controllers, Alternative Fuels, and Stage II Vapor Recovery. Each research project pointed toward the same conclusion. The 1989 EPA regulations had brought a structural change to the industrial and commercial fleet refueling market. In May 1993, Havill Consultants published its second major syndicated study of the petroleum equipment industry. While distribution of the actual industry forecast has been restricted to subscribing companies, National Petroleum News (NPN) published the 1998 compliance statistics in their November 1993 feature article. NPN called the research "the most detailed analysis and outlook to date on the impact of the EPA's UST regs on the petroleum marketplace." Over 1,600 owners of motor fuel facilities throughout the country were interviewed.

   One major finding from the study was that over 30 percent of the fleet refueling facilities included in the study had no plans for upgrading to meet the UST corrosion protection deadline in 1998. This statistic takes into consideration planned closures, which have been running in excess of 6 percent per year. The high cost of equipment and the potential liability of a spill have replaced supply security as the owner's primary concern. It is apparent that on-site refueling can no longer be justified for convenience alone.

   Havill Consultants estimate that the 50,000 facilities with no compliance plans purchase over 5 billion gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel annually. Some of these facilities will upgrade, some will remove their USTs and replace them with above ground tanks, others will convert to alternative fuels, many will close down their on-site facilities completely and refuel at retail locations. These structural changes will occur over the next six years, establishing a new trend in the commercial refueling market.

   Separate research conducted by Havill Consultants on the purchase behavior of fleet administrators has shown that the decision to upgrade on-site facilities involves a trade-off between cost and control. Fleet administrators are concerned about fuel contamination, spills, pilferage, cross-fueling diesel and gasoline, refueling with the wrong grade of fuel, underfilling, and unauthorized vehicle refueling. Their central refueling facilities control these variables. Refueling takes place in a secured area, frequently by specialized service personnel. A log is maintained showing the date and time of each refueling, the gallons of fuel dispensed, the vehicle identification number and odometer reading, the driver's name, and the service performed. Management reports are generated that allow the fleet administrator to plan maintenance schedules and analyze fuel usage and operating costs. Unusual patterns can be detected for further analysis.

   Major oil companies are installing new fleet management systems to increase the control that fleet administrators have over off-site refueling. The infrastructure for these new fleet management systems has been made possible by advances in dispenser and POS technology, and the growth of debit and credit card networks. During the first quarter of 1994, Havill Consultants completed a proprietary study of Major oil company trends for POS and fleet programs. Three-fourths of the majors aggressively market their commercial fleet programs. They are developing proprietary systems that replicate the management controls that fleet administrators have at their central refueling centers. Major oil companies have been investing heavily in the hardware to implement their fleet management systems. The research found that two out of every three new dispensers that are shipped to major oil companies have internal card readers installed. This is almost twice the number shipped two years ago.

   The growth in commercial fleet systems has not gone unnoticed by independent oil companies and C-store chains. The ‘94 State of the Industry Report published by the National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) reported that 49% of stores accepted fleet cards in 1993, up from 22% in 1992. Third party suppliers like Fuelman, Wright Express, GasCard, CFN (Commercial Fueling Network), and Pacific Pride are providing fleet card programs to fuel marketers who choose not to develop their own programs. Some third party suppliers have seen their business double over the past two years. These new fleet programs offered by major oil, independent oil, and c-store companies have increased the control that fleet administrators have over off-site refueling. At the same time, EPA regulations have escalated the cost and liability of on-site facilities. The combined impact has resulted in a shift in the refueling methods of industrial and commercial vehicles from on-site to retail locations.

   To capture a share of this emerging market, the alternative fuels industry must replicate the most important commercial refueling amenities. Convenience and control are important. Therefore, the most successful alternative fuels suppliers will develop fleet card programs and provide commercial customers with management reports like they now use. The early philosophy of "build it and they will come" is giving way to locating refueling facilities based on commercial vehicle traffic patterns. Realizing their strength is production, some industry participants are turning to petroleum marketers to add alternative fuels to their stations. To date, progress has been slow. In a recent alternative fuels survey, most major oil companies reported to Havill Consultants that they had built "several pilot facilities". However, the demand for alternative fuels is negligible compared to petroleum sales.

   As fleet operators evaluate their refueling options, they must consider how they will be affected by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT), and state alternative fuel mandates. Excluding off-road vehicles and truck stops, Havill Consultants estimate that 23 billion gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel are consumed annually by commercial vehicles. Regulations will force the annual consumption of about 600 million gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel to alternative fuels by 1998. This represents less than 3 percent of the available market. The challenge to the alternative fuels industry in the 1990s is to capture a greater share of the commercial refueling market. Cost alone will not determine success.

Top

-----------------------------------------

OBJECTIVES OF THE 1994 FLEET STUDY

   The primary purpose of this research is to forecast the changes that will occur in the refueling of private and commercial fleets through 2000. The report will provide an accurate benchmark of current vehicle and refueling demographics. The study will detail the fleet administrator’s needs in each market segment and evaluate how satisfied fleet administrators are with the vehicles, fuels, and refueling systems offered by competing suppliers. The study will also define actions that suppliers must take to influence fleet administrators to consider their products and services. Follow-up research planned for 1996 and 1998 will allow subscribers to track their effectiveness in the marketplace.

   The commercial fleet market is large and diverse. It can be divided into eight major segments: government/public owned vehicles, over the road (OTR) carriers, dispersed corporate vehicles, utility vehicles, delivery vehicles, service vehicles, airport vehicles, and auto rental vehicles. Currently, almost half of all refueling is at private facilities. Over one-third of all underground storage tanks are owned by non-retail businesses. To clearly understand the changes that will occur in this market during the 1990s, it is important to determine the underlying trends impacting each market segment. The overall study objectives will be achieved by analyzing and aggregating these individual segments. The primary objectives are to:

  1. Characterize each market segment in terms of current vehicle and refueling demographics.
  2. Identify the fleet operator's awareness and attitude toward current and pending federal and state regulations affecting:
    1. Commercial fleets
      1. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA)
      2. Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT)
      3. State alternative fuel mandates
    2. On-site refueling facilities
      1. Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulations
      2. Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) regulations
  3. Determine if the operator is in compliance with current and pending regulations.
  4. Define features that fleet operators must have and want to have incorporated into their:
    1. Vehicle fleet
      1. petroleum fuels versus alternative fuels
    2. Refueling operations
      1. on-site versus off-site
  5. Determine the current level of satisfaction across each market segment with fleet and refueling operations. This comparative analysis will evaluate competing:
    1. Vehicle fuel types: gasoline, diesel, CNG, M-85, LPG, LNG, E-85
    2. Refueling systems: on-site versus off-site
    3. Fleet card programs: those developed in-house as well as those offered by major oil companies and third party suppliers like Fuelman, Wright Express, GasCard, CFN (Commercial Fueling Network), and Pacific Pride
  6. Establish the fleet operator’s criteria for trading off cost, convenience, and control for petroleum fuels versus alternative fuels,  and for on-site versus off-site refueling.
  7. Benchmark the consumption of gasoline, diesel, CNG, M-85, LPG, LNG, and E-85 fuels within the commercial fleet market; then, determine what it would take for the fleet administrator to consider each of the alternative choices.
    1. Forecast changes in vehicle fuel types
    2. Forecast the changes in fleet vehicle populations based on new vehicle purchases and conversions, as the market moves towards alternative fuels
  8. Record the dollar value and timing for planned investments in refueling operations; then, determine what it would take for them to consider each of the alternative choices.
    1. Forecast changes in on-site and off-site fueling equipment
    2. Forecast changes in fleet card programs: those developed in-house as well as those offered by major oil companies and third party suppliers like Fuelman, Wright Express, GasCard, CFN (Commercial Fueling Network), and Pacific Pride
  9. Characterize the fleet operator’s decision making process when considering upgrading their current on-site refueling facility vs. retail refueling vs. converting to alternative fuels.
  10. Develop alternatives to the most likely scenarios based upon varying levels of regulatory awareness, different levels of compliance, and the possibility of additional legislation.

Top

-----------------------------------------

METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES

   Havill Consultants have a proven track record of developing accurate industry forecasts for syndication and for individual clients. From our experience, the most reliable information source for predicting future buying patterns comes from the end-users themselves. For this study, in-depth interviews will be conducted with over 1,000 fleet administrators. They will be asked detailed questions about their future vehicle, fuel, and refueling plans.

   This study will build on research compiled in previous studies including the well-respected "United States EPA Regulated Retail, Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Market, 1992 - 1998." From that study, we know that nearly one-third of all private facilities have no plans to bring their sites into compliance with all of the UST regs. Furthermore, it is well known that many fleet administrators have yet to evaluate off-site refueling and alternative fuels. For these reasons, the study methodology will focus on defining the underlying decision making process of fleet administrators. By clearly understanding the trade-offs that fleet administrators make between cost, convenience, and control, the decision making process for each major segment of the private market will be modeled. The composite forecast will be built by aggregating the major market segments.

   An added reason for our rigorous methodology of interviewing a large cross-section of fleet administrators is to develop an accurate benchmark on the refueling patterns of fleet operators. The Federal Government tracks the distribution of fuel to retail outlets and to non-retail facilities. However, there are no reliable statistics on the volume of fuel that is channeled into the fleet market through retail outlets. We know that it is significant. In a recent study, a large number of fleet owners reported that they closed their on-site refueling operations and are now buying retail. What is not known is the volume of fuel being sold to fleets through retail outlets and how much growth is left in this sector of the market. It is difficult to improve something that is not being measured. Our clients report that they would like benchmarks every two years so they can evaluate the effectiveness of their marketing programs and implement necessary improvements.

   In preparation for this study, Havill Consultants conducted the background research necessary for achieving the study objectives. Primary information sources included government agencies, fleet associations, and petroleum industry associations. Next, the project team surveyed over 200 executives at major corporations in the automotive, petroleum marketing, alternative fuels, refueling equipment, and fleet management systems industries. This process yielded the objectives for this study and the initial set of questions for the fleet administrator questionnaires.

   Our research follows a proven methodology. The field work will begin by designing questionnaires for the interviews that will be conducted with fleet administrators. All questionnaires will be pre-tested by conducting a dozen interviews, analyzing the results, making any necessary revisions, and then continuing the cycle until all refinements have been made to the questionnaires. Subscribers will be given the opportunity to review these questionnaires and suggest revisions so long as the changes do not substantially change the scope of the research.

   This study will employ a stratified random sample of at least 1,000 fleet administrators. The list will be obtained from fleet publications, associations, and other secondary sources. It will represent all types of fleets in all areas of the country. An average of 125 interviews will be conducted for each of the eight industry segments listed below:

  1. Government/Public-Owned
  2. Delivery Focused
  3. OTR Carriers
  4. Service Focused
  5. Dispersed Corporate Fleets
  6. Airport Focused
  7. Utility Focused
  8. Auto Rental Fleets

  As interviews are completed, they will be entered into the Survey System®, our full-featured market research software program. Market survey data from each questionnaire will be computer tabulated and projected to the fleet population. Fleet population statistics will be based on our secondary and primary research. Statistical procedures will be applied to establish the significance of the research findings.

   Havill & Company will personally manage all aspects of the project. Each of the professionals assigned to this project have petroleum marketing research experience. They will share responsibility for the total project including secondary research, questionnaire design, interviewing, analysis, and writing the final report. All study findings will be fully documented in a report of approximately 200 pages. Where appropriate, graphs will be used to visually support the analysis.

   Charter subscribers to the study may request special analysis of specific questions that were included in the research. Subscribers may also suggest special analysis as long as their suggestions are submitted prior to the primary research phase, and do not materially increase the total cost of the research. Approximately one month after the delivery of the final report, Havill & Company staff members will be available to meet with individual subscribers to discuss issues arising from the study. If there is sufficient interest, a multi-client study conference will be held in the Detroit Metro Airport area.

Top

-----------------------------------------

STUDY FINDINGS

   In 1989, the industrial/commercial UST population was 768 thousand. Today it stands at a mere 406 thousand, which represents a 47 percent decrease in the population in only 6 years. As would be expected, the primary reasons for the reduction in population are the EPA's corrosion and leak detection regulations. When asked, more than half of the fleet administrators who, at one time, had on-site refueling facilities cited the regulations as the primary reason for the closing of their facility. High operating expenses are also a reason cited for closing facilities.

CURRENT COMPLIANCE WITH 1998 FPA REGULATIONS

   In the current market, 70 percent of the USTs being utilized for fuel storage are in compliance with the 1998 EPA corrosion protection requirements. Nevertheless, there is more to the regulations than just tank corrosion protection.
   There is also piping corrosion protection, spill containment, overfill prevention, and leak detection to consider. When all of the additional requirements are taken into account, only 52 percent, or 106 thousand facilities, are in compliance at this time. According to the fleet administrators interviewed, 28 percent of the UST facilities in the United States will be upgraded by 1998. This portion of the market represents over 58 thousand facilities. UST replacements will dominate the upgrade market through 1998, occurring at three-fourths of the upgrade facilities. Following UST replacements are tank leak detection, overfill prevention, and piping upgrades. These results indicate that at the majority of the facilities to be upgraded, the "heart" of the system is what will be replaced.

UST FACILITIES CONVERTING TO AST SYSTEMS

95f_composition           

   Although more than 106 thousand facilities are currently in compliance, 58 thousand will be upgrading through 1998. Twenty-two thousand UST facilities will have converted to AST systems. Those facilities replacing their UST systems with AST systems can be characterized as small business fleets that use relatively small amounts of fuel. These fleets are comprised mainly of sedans, vans, and light duty trucks.

   ASTs have become an alternative to complying with the EPA regulations, hence, the market for ASTs promises more robust growth through the end of the century.

MAJOR CHANGES SPURRED BY EPA REGULATIONS

   Presently, 70 percent of the I/C USTs meet corrosion protection requirements. However, only 52 percent of the systems meet all requirements. This means that 5.8 billion gallons of fuel in the 4+ fleet market is dispensed at facilities presently out of compliance with 1998 EPA regulations. According to the plans of fleet administrators, 3.5 billion gallons are expected to upgrade into compliance before the deadline, leaving 2.3 billion gallons out of compliance and likely to convert to off-site refueling. This mass exodus from on-site facilities provides a tremendous opportunity for petroleum marketers. 95f_onsite

 

FLEET VEHICLES AND THEIR REFUELING PRACTICES AND REQUIREMENTS

   Until recently, the true size, refueling volume, and segmentation of the I/C vehicle and refueling market was all but a mystery. No one had quantified the fleet vehicle population and its corresponding fuel consumption, especially not at the business segment level. Because information pertaining to the commercial market was sparse, at best, marketers had not implemented strategies that targeted the commercial market. In recent years, marketers have begun to realize that the commercial segment represents a significant portion of their business volume. Therefore, market intelligence is needed to facilitate the targeting of the commercial market and its segments. One of these targeting opportunities lies in the market for diesel fuel. In the commercial fleet market, diesel fuel consumption represents 46 percent of the total fuel consumed, yet few retail outlets offer diesel fuel. The segments consuming the most diesel fuel include construction, OTR, manufacturing, and agriculture, each of which consumes at least 1.5 billion gallons of diesel fuel per year.

   In order to target these segments effectively, marketers must first define the segments of the commercial fleet population. Once this has been completed, the population and composition of the fleets must be determined. Following these two tasks, the travel patterns, number of miles traveled annually, and the average miles per gallon for each vehicle type should be determined so that the total annual consumption for each segment can be determined. In the United States today, fleets with 4 or more vehicles account for 19 million vehicles, or 10 percent of the total domestic vehicle population. Interestingly enough, fuel consumption of 4+ commercial fleets represents in excess of 20 percent of the total annual domestic fuel consumption. This high level of concentration makes the I/C market very attractive to petroleum marketers.  In terms of fuel consumption, government, construction, and the OTR segments combined account for 53 percent of the annual 4+ fleet fuel consumption. Among the top three segments for fuel consumption, on- site versus off-site consumption varies. For the government and OTR segments, the majority of fuel consumed is dispensed through on-site refueling facilities. Seventy-three percent of government refueling takes place at on-site facilities compared to 54 percent for the OTR segment. For the construction segment, however, only 35 percent of the refueling is done on-site, leaving 65 percent of the refueling business to be conducted at off-site or retail facilities.

Top

-----------------------------------------

DELIVERABLES

   The final report will be based on the outline shown below. Approximately one chapter will be dedicated to the executive summary and each major topic. The executive summary will provide an overview of the fleet market and the core market characteristics. Each chapter will discuss the particular objective and related data. Each client will receive three copies of the final report.

Top

-----------------------------------------

OVERVIEW AND REPORT LAYOUT

Executive Summary

Introduction and Overview

Major Issues

Methodology and Data Sources

Summary of Fleet Market Forecast

Fleet Market Characteristics

Number of Owners

Number of Vehicles

Fleet Vehicle Classes

Segmentation

  • Government & Public Owned
  • OTR Carriers
  • Dispersed Corporate Fleets
  • Utility Focused
  • Service Focused
  • Airport Focused
  • Auto Rental Fleets
  • Delivery Focused

Fleet Refueling Sites

  • On-site
  • Shared Site
  • Off-site

Fuel Management Systems in Use

  • Jobber Card Lock
  • Major Oil Credit Programs
  • Third Party Credit Programs
  • Debit-Based Systems

Present EPA Compliance

Identification of Needs and Features of Fleet Refueling Programs

Refueling Facility Needs

  • Retail vs. Commercial Dispenser
  • Dedicated vs. Non-Dedicated Sites
  • Dedicated vs. Non-Dedicated Islands at Retail Outlets
  • On-site/Off-site Compatibility
  • 24-hour Access
  • Availability of TBA Merchandise and Services

Dispenser Features

  • Card Readers in the Dispenser
  • Receipt Printers
  • Vehicle Identification Transmitters (VITs)
  • High-Speed Refueling Nozzles

Features of Fuel Management Systems

  • Credit Transaction Capabilities
  • Debit Transaction Capabilities
  • Emergency Cash and/or Debit Flexibility
  • Signature Verified Billing
  • PIN Access Required
  • Product Lock-Outs
  • Time Lock-Outs
  • Unauthorized Purchase Flags
  • Driver Identification Data
  • Location and Time Data
  • Odometer Readings
  • Cost per Mile
  • Fuel Grade Information
  • Separation of Base Fuel Price and Taxes
  • Credit Ticket Receipts
  • Volume Discounts
  • Flexibility to Use at TBAs
  • Ability to Use for Auto Rental
  • Availability of Report Data on Floppy
  • On-Line Availability of Report Data

Benchmark of Fuel Consumption In the Fleet Market

Motor Gasoline

Total Market Size

  • Total Gallonage
  • Number of Outlets

Consumption by Distribution Channel

  • Bulk from Major Oil
  • Bulk from Jobber
  • Direct from Major Oil Retail
  • Direct from Jobber Retail

No. 2 Diesel

Total Market Size

  • Total Gallonage
  • Number of Outlets

Consumption by Distribution Channel

  • Bulk from Major Oil
  • Bulk from Jobber
  • Direct from Major Oil Retail
  • Direct from Jobber Retail

Alternative Fuels

Total Market Size

  • Total Gallonage
  • Number of Outlets

Consumption by Distribution Channel

  • Bulk for On-Site Refueling
  • Other Refueling Facility

Benchmark of the Commercial Credit Card Market

Commercial Credit Market Share

  • Overall Market Size of Commercial Credit Programs

  • Market Share of Individual Commercial Credit Card Programs

Present Satisfaction Levels with Available Fuel Refueling Programs

  • Identify "Brand Awareness" of Existing Programs

  • Fleet Operator Evaluations of Features, Service, and Overall Quality

  • Identify Possible "Selling Points" and Incentives

Competitive Analysis of Major Oil and Third Party Fleet Programs

  • Summary of Each Program

  • Comparative Indexes of Size and Market Penetration

  • Number of Stations in Network
  • Number of Transactions Processed
  • Number of States, Stations, and Licensees where Accepted

Benchmark of Alternative Fuel Plans

  • Identify Fleet Plans to Incorporate Alternatively Fueled Vehicles

  • Identify Timing for Alternative Fuel Related Decisions

  • Identify Future Refueling Needs in Fuel Management Programs

  • Probe Expectations for Maintenance

  • Probe Expectations for Fueling Equipment

  • Probe Demand for Conversion/Turnkey Services

Forecast of Market Conditions, through 2000

  • Fleet Population Changes

  • Motor Gasoline and Diesel Consumption

  • Alternative Fuel Consumption

  • Fleet Refueling Market Share

Recommendations

Profiles of Fleets Interviewed

Appendix

 

Note: The specific final report outline is subject to change based on survey results. This outline is the basis for the intended final deliverable.

Top

-----------------------------------------

WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THE STUDY

   This study has been designed for clients in the automotive, petroleum marketing, alternative fuels, refueling equipment, and fleet management systems industries. During the design phase of this project, "issue ballots" were mailed or faxed to 200 executives in these industries. While each company was interested in market research on their particular product and service, the interest in defining the structural changes occurring in the fleet market cut across all industries.

  The differences in the type of information executives needed were more a function of the stage of "product life cycle development" than the product itself. Several companies reported that they had formed multi-function task forces several years ago to develop their commercial fleet strategies. Today, their fleet programs are well underway and their teams have disbanded. These companies wanted market statistics that would compare their performance against competitors and measure the effectiveness of programs already in place. They also wanted a forecast of unit growth for planning purposes. Other executives that we talked to said that they were now in the process of developing their fleet strategies. They wanted the fleet administrator "needs and satisfaction analysis" to guide market development activities. Equally important was the segmentation analysis so market niches could be exploited.

  • CEOs, Division Presidents, and General Managers - This research will provide accurate quantitative data on the size and growth of the industry and your company's position in the marketplace. It will provide valuable benchmarks for evaluating the effectiveness of current fleet market programs.

  • Strategic Planning - This research will forecast the structural changes that will occur in the fleet market for the period 1994 - 2000. It will identify the key issues forcing change in the marketplace. This will provide valuable information for developing long range strategic plans.

  • R&D and Engineering Managers - This research will define the technical specifications required by fleet administrators in each major segment of the fleet market. This will allow technical managers to design-in the features in greatest demand by fleet administrators and screen new product opportunity.

  • Marketing and Product Managers - This research will characterize the fleet market and define the market mix required to penetrate each major segment. This will provide valuable information for prioritizing opportunities and enhancing market development programs.

Top

-----------------------------------------

PRICING AND PAYMENT

   To ensure that the study is thorough and complete, five consultants will be assigned to the fleet market study team. This team will be available for consultation and follow-up projects at the conclusion of the 5-month project.

   The cost of this study will be $12,500 for charter subscribers that sign up by December 15, 1994. After December 15, 1994, the subscription fee will be $14,000. To subscribe, please fill in the purchase agreement and return one copy to us. We are confident you will find that we have earned our reputation for achieving significant, long-lasting results for our clients.

Top

-----------------------------------------

FLEET MARKET STUDY PROJECT TEAM

   Havill & Company consultants routinely conduct both syndicated and proprietary studies of the petroleum market. Major research studies have included:

  • The New European Petroleum Equipment Market For Gasoline Service Station Products and Services. (Multi-Client, September 1994).
  • Sales & Marketing Effectiveness Tracking Report. (Non-Competing Multi-Client, September 1994).
  • Stage II Vapor Recovery - Retail, Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Markets, Analysis and Forecast. (Multi-Client, April 1992, September 1993, May 1994).
  • Major Oil Company Trends, Stage II - POS - Fleet Programs. (Proprietary, December 1993).
  • Automatic Dry Break Fueling System Fleet Administrator Study. (Proprietary, October 1993).
  • Analysis and Trends, A Study of the 1992 Tank Market. (Proprietary, August 1993).
  • The United States EPA Regulated Retail, Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Markets, Current year - 1998. (Multi-Client, May 1990, June 1993).
  • Stage II Vapor Recovery Distribution Analysis. (Non-Competing Multi-Client, March 1993).
  • Underground Tank Retirement and Failure Rate Study. (Proprietary, November 1992).
  • Stage II Vapor Recovery Retail, Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Markets, Analysis and Forecast. (Multi-Client, April 1992).
  • Petroleum Industry Data Management & Control Systems (Proprietary, December 1991).
  • Retail, Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Market Share Study for Petroleum Equipment. (Proprietary, October 1991).
  • Petroleum Equipment Study - Retail, Commercial, and Industrial Gasoline Service Station Markets, 1990 Record - 1991 Outlook. (Multi-Client, May 1991).
  • C-Store Market Opportunity for Petroleum Equipment. (Proprietary, January 1991).

   These studies have covered the full gamut of refueling equipment: underground tanks, flexible connectors, piping, sumps, spill containment, overfill protection, leak detection, in-tank gauging, dispensers, hose, nozzles, Card Locks, POS, and site controllers. From this research, we have developed contacts with contractors, distributors, and petroleum marketers including the major oil companies. We have conducted research outside the United States, in both French and Spanish speaking countries.

   All work on this project will be directed by Nicholas R. Havill, founder and President of Havill & Company. The project will be managed by Joseph Slagle and Justin Zohn. Both have extensive project management experience in the petroleum industry. All staff members assigned to this project has been involved in previous petroleum market studies.

Top

----------------------------------------- 

PURCHASE AGREEMENT

This agreement is a contract to subscribe to The DOE-EPA Regulated Commercial Fleet Market for Fuels, Equipment, and Services, 1994-2000 as described in this October 1994 prospectus, which the undersigned acknowledges having received and read. To enroll, please complete and sign this agreement, and return to: Havill & Company, Inc., 3178 N. Republic Blvd., Toledo, OH 43615. The following terms formalize this agreement between Havill & Company, Inc. ("Havill"), and the undersigned participating company (the "Subscriber"), who hereby agree as follows:

1. Havill shall provide to the Subscriber three (3) copies of The DOE-EPA Regulated Commercial Fleet Market for Fuels, Equipment, and Services, 1994-2000 report pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement.

2. In exchange for the reports to be provided by Havill, the Subscriber shall pay Havill the Subscription Fee specified in item 3, below. All services to be rendered by Havill pursuant to this agreement are conditional upon adequate funding from participating subscribers. Havill reserves the right to abandon the project and terminate all of its obligations under this agreement by written notice to the Subscriber if Havill is not fully funded. In that case, the Subscriber's deposit will be returned and the project will be canceled. At its discretion, Havill may proceed even if the program is not fully subscribed.

3. Subscription Fee schedule:

3a. The Subscription Fee for corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietors is $12,500, one-half payable on or before December 31, 1994, and one-half payable upon completion of the research. The subscription fee may be shared among subsidiaries, divisions, or other legal entities thereof, in which the Subscriber holds a significant equity position.

3b. Alliance Partners ("Partners"), are two or more corporations, partnerships, or sole proprietors that join together in offering the marketplace a product or service. A Subscriber to this study may sponsor a Partner if a contractual relationship exists to share technology, marketing responsibility, or other legitimate business activities. The Subscriber who sponsors a Partner is required to act as intermediary in all communications between Havill and the Subscriber’s Partner. Partners are a special class of Subscribers and are bound to the same terms and conditions of this agreement that bind all Subscribers. A Partner can have only one sponsoring Subscriber. The fee schedule for each Subscriber and each Partner of the alliance is as follows:

3b1. 1 Subscriber+1 Partner = $6,250 each prior to 12/31/94, $3,000 each upon completion.

3b2. 1 Subscriber+2 Partners = $6,250 each prior to 12/31/94, $2,000 each upon completion.

3b3. 1 Subscriber+3 Partners = $6,250 each prior to 12/31/94, $1,000 each upon completion.

3b4. 1 Subscriber+4 or more Partners = $6,250 each prior to 12/31/94, no payment upon completion.

4. The term of the research provided pursuant to this agreement shall be for a period beginning upon the date of execution of this agreement and ending upon completion of the project. Havill may terminate its obligations under this agreement prior to June 1, 1995, if the Subscriber does not comply with the terms or conditions of this agreement.

5. The Subscriber hereby consents to the use by Havill of all data and information furnished to Havill by the Subscriber, and represents and agrees that all such data and information will be valid and accurate.

6. Havill draws on information and analysis believed to be reliable. However, neither Havill nor individuals credited with authorship or support can guarantee accuracy or completeness, or be liable for possible errors of fact or judgment. The Subscriber hereby releases and waives any and all claims it may have against Havill their respective directors, members, shareholders, officers, employees, agents, and representatives (collectively, "Representatives") from any and all claims, liabilities, or damages resulting from the use of information or data or services provided by Havill. The Subscriber may only use the data or information provided by Havill within the subscriber's company, but such information shall not be used or relied upon as the exclusive basis for evaluating sales and marketing decisions. IN NO EVENT WILL HAVILL OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY OUT OF THE USE OF, OR INABILITY TO USE, HAVILL INFORMATION OR SERVICES. If any of the limitations on liability of Havill or the Subscribers affiliated therewith or their Representatives contained in this agreement are found to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Subscriber agrees that the maximum liability of Havill and its affiliated Subscribers or their Representatives shall not, in the aggregate, be greater than the enrollment price of the study paid by the Subscriber.

7. The Subscriber acknowledges and agrees that Havill is the owner of all rights, titles, and interests in and to Havill research, its database and information, including without limitation, all patent, copyright, trademark, service mark, trade secret, and trade name rights in and to the foregoing. The Subscriber shall not disclose to anyone, or permit anyone access to, Havill data, information, or programs. The Subscriber agrees that any breach of this paragraph would cause Havill irreparable injury, and that upon any breach or attempted breach of this paragraph, Havill shall have the right to injunctive relief in addition to any other remedies at law or equity.

8. This agreement shall be governed by Ohio law. Each party hereby designates the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County, Ohio, as the court of proper jurisdiction and venue of and for any and all lawsuits or other legal proceedings relating to this agreement and hereby irrevocably consent to such designation, jurisdiction, and venue; and hereby waive any objections or defenses relating to jurisdiction or venue with respect to any lawsuit or other legal proceeding initiated in the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County, Ohio.

 

Date:_______________, 19____ Date:_______________, 19____

___________________________________ HAVILL & COMPANY, INC.

Accepted For:

By_________________________________ By_________________________________

(Signature)                                                  (Signature)

___________________________________ ___________________________________

Print or Type Name and Title                        Print or Type Name and Title

Address:

 

Telephone:

FAX:

Please send a check payable to the Havill & Company, Inc., for $6,250 and return this signed agreement on or before December 30, 1994 by mail to:

Havill & Company, Inc.
3178 N. Republic Blvd.
Toledo, Ohio 43615
Phone: (419) 841-2244
Fax: (419) 841-2211

Top